Planned Gift Design Services
social media and e-mail
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Jack Straw Fortnightly
  • PG 103
  • The Greystocke Project
    • section 112 problem child
    • income ordering rule shifts benefit to lower generation
    • unanswered questions in PLR 201735005
    • waiting for the other shoe
    • landmark or mirage
    • the ask
    • three sixty five
    • speaking at MNPGC in november
  • Case Studies
    • The "pre'69" remainder trust
    • The nonqualified testamentary CRAT
    • Correctly reporting an indirect skip
    • Anti-lapse statutes and revocable trusts
  • speaking to your group
    • Presentations
  • Blog
  • Contact

comments submitted on proposed 642(h) regs

6/18/2020

 
The Greystocke Project is submitting comments on the proposed regs that would clarify, at long last, that excess deductions on termination on an estate or trust are not per se miscellaneous itemized deductions in the hands of the distributees.
greystocke_project_comment_reg-113295-18.pdf
File Size: 54 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Comments are closed.

    the very occasional blogger

    The text here used to say,

    "In my 'day job,'  I do not often have an opportunity to articulate some of my more contrarian views."

    With the launch of the Jack Straw Fortnightly back in January 2018 that is no longer the case. This blog remains "very occasional," however, and functions primarily as a place to post news releases.

    Archives

    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    December 2019
    February 2019
    December 2017
    December 2014
    December 2013

    Categories

    All
    Acr
    Pease
    Tax Expenditures

    RSS Feed