Planned Gift Design Services
social media and e-mail
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Jack Straw Fortnightly
  • PG 103
  • The Greystocke Project
    • section 112 problem child
    • income ordering rule shifts benefit to lower generation
    • unanswered questions in PLR 201735005
    • waiting for the other shoe
    • landmark or mirage
    • the ask
    • three sixty five
    • speaking at MNPGC in november
  • Case Studies
    • The "pre'69" remainder trust
    • The nonqualified testamentary CRAT
    • Correctly reporting an indirect skip
    • Anti-lapse statutes and revocable trusts
  • speaking to your group
    • Presentations
  • Blog
  • Contact
An article I wrote for Thomson Reuters' monthly Estate Planning magazine, expanding an argument I was developing in Jack Straw volume one,  number three,  in connection with the Craig Trust case out of New Hampshire, to the effect that section 112 of the uniform trust code, which extends the rules of construction for a decedent's will to the interpretation of a revocable trust functioning as a "will substitute," is at odds with the theory under which the revocable trust found acceptance at common law.

The paper is also posted to SSRN at abstract number 3422184.
etpl-19-07-32-willis.pdf
File Size: 224 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

The paralegal consulting services described on this site are offered only to lawyers.
Russ is not maintaining an active license to practice law.
He is not licensed in Arizona, and he does not offer legal services in Arizona.

Proudly powered by Weebly